Protoxol replaces the stitched-together stack of EDR + NDR + SIEM + email + intel + VM with a single data model, one correlation engine and one operating console. Below is why it consistently beats the alternatives.
Endpoint, network, identity, mail and cloud signals land in the same schema. No mapping projects. No translation tax when you add a module two years later.
Signals are correlated in sub-second by actor, asset and chain of behavior — before they reach an analyst. The queue is incident-shaped, not alert-shaped.
Severity is built from exposure × exploitability × blast radius — not a static CVSS field. Analysts work down a queue ordered by real impact.
Playbooks suggest, queue and explain. An analyst approves or revises before any external action runs. Every step is logged, reversible and audited.
Webhooks, REST, OTEL out. Splunk, Elastic, Wazuh, Suricata, Zeek in. Protoxol replaces the SIEM or streams into it. No lock-in clauses.
Start with one module. Activate ten. Pricing scales with what you protect — not with seats, ingest tiers or vendor sales engineering.
SaaS in EU/US regions, or self-hosted on your infrastructure. The product surface is identical — same console, same API, same playbooks.
The console is designed for the analyst at 03:14 AM — not the buyer at a conference booth. Keyboard-first, pivots in one click, traceable actions.
Most security teams stitch a SIEM, an EDR and an XDR together — three tools, three pricing models, three migration projects. Protoxol covers the same surface area natively. Below is exactly where it wins, where it ties, and where a specialist tool may still fit.
Same data model, same console, same pricing model.
SIEM + EDR + XDR collapse into a single product surface.
From contract to first prevented incident — measurable in weeks, not quarters.
| Capability | Protoxol | Traditional SIEM | Standalone EDR | Enterprise XDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unified data model across endpoint + network + email | ✓ | × | × | ~ |
| Streaming correlation under 1 second | ✓ | × | ~ | ~ |
| Risk-based prioritization (exposure × exploitability) | ✓ | × | × | ~ |
| Supervised, traceable automation | ✓ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
| SaaS + on-prem with same product surface | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | × |
| Modular pricing — pay only what you use | ✓ | × | ✓ | × |
| Open by design — no SIEM lock-in | ✓ | × | ✓ | × |
| Suitable for MSPs / multi-tenant out of the box | ✓ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
| Time-to-value under 30 days | ✓ | × | ✓ | × |
Where the alternatives still fit: a single-purpose deployment (just endpoint, just SIEM) where consolidation is not on the roadmap. Where Protoxol wins: any team that has more than two security tools and a finite budget.
Modules share the same data model and event bus. Add a module and every existing detection, query and playbook benefits — no glue code, no re-ingestion.
A 30-minute technical session with one of our engineers: real environment, live console, working detections and clear answers to your use case.